cacert-policies/TTPAssistedAssurancePolicy.html

416 lines
14 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title> CACert -- TTP-Assisted Assurance Policy </title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--
.q {
color : green;
text-indent : 2em;
font-weight: bold;
font-style:italic;
}
.error {
color : red;
font-weight: bold;
text-align: center;
font-style:italic;
}
.change {
color : blue;
font-weight: bold;
}
.strike {
color : blue;
text-decoration:line-through;
}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1> TTP-Assisted Assurance Policy </h1>
<p>
<a href="PolicyOnPolicy.html"><img align="right" src="images/cacert-wip.png" alt="CAcert Policy Status" height="31" width="88" style="border-style: none;" /></a>
Editor: Iang<br />
Creation Date : <a href="https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Assurance/Minutes/20091215HamburgMiniTOP.html">20091215</a><br />
Status: WIP 20100705<br />
Licence: <a href="wiki.cacert.org/Policy#Licence" title="this document is Copyright CAcert, licensed openly under CC-by-sa with all disputes resolved under DRP. More at wiki.cacert.org/Policy" > CC-by-sa/DRP </a><br />
</p>
<h2> <a name="0"> 0. </a> Preliminaries </h2>
<p>
This sub-policy extends the
<a href="//www.cacert.org/policy/AssurancePolicy.php">
Assurance Policy</a> ("AP" => COD13)
by specifying how Assurers can be assisted by
outsourcing the identity documents verification
component of assurance to trusted third parties (TTPs).
<span class="change">
Definitions can be found in AP or in
<a href="//wiki.cacert.org/AssuranceHandbook">Assurance Handbook</a>
("AH").
</span>
</p>
<h2> <a name="1"> 1. </a> Scope </h2>
<p>
This sub-policy is restricted to members located
in areas not well-served with Assurers.
<span class="change">
It serves a goal of promoting both Assurers and Members is those areas.
</span>
</p>
<h2> <a name="1"> 2. </a> Roles </h2>
<h3> <a name="1"> 2.1 </a> Trusted Third Party </h3>
<p>
A Trusted Third Party ("TTP") is a person who is traditionally respected
for making reliable statements to others, especially over identification
documents. Typically, notaries public (anglo),
Notaries (European), bank managers, accountants
and lawyers.
</p>
<p class="strike">
The Board maintains a list of approved classes of TTP
and forms of documents.
The list is expected to vary according to the
different juridical traditions of different regions.
</p>
<h3> <a name="2.2"> 2.2 </a> The Assurer <span class="change">(aka TTP-admin)</a> </h3>
<p class="q">uli: (Synonyms: TTP-Assurer, TTP-Admin)</p>
<p>
To employ a TTP in an assurance,
the Assurer must
<span class="change">
be a Senior Assurer.
</span>
<span class="strike">
have 50 experience points, and pass other checks as imposed by the Board from time to time.
</span>
The Assurer must be familiar with the local
language and customs.
</p>
<ul class="q"><li>uli: Needs the TTP-Admin be appointed ? Who appoints TTP-Admins ? AO ? Board ?</li>
<li>In the past, the TTP-admin was appointed by the board or was the Secretarys duty.</li>
<li>Iang: suggested above in blue that as Senior Assurer, no appointment is necessary.</li>
</ul>
<h3> <a name="2.3"> 2.3 </a> Member </h3>
<p>
A Member ("assuree") who is located in a place not well-served
by Assurers may use the TTP-assisted Assurance.
</p>
<h2> <a name="3"> 3. </a> The Assurance </h2>
<p class="q">Iang: I suggest this be section 3:</p>
<p class="change">
Assurance assisted by TTP must meet these requirements:
</p>
<ol class="change" type="a"><li>
The Assurer must positively confirm the identity and
suitability of the TTP.
</li><li>
The TTP and the Member must meet face-to-face.
</li><li>
The TTP confirms the details supporting the Assurance Statement.
</li><li>
The Assurer makes a reliable statement to confirm the
Assurance Statement.
</li><li>
<i>
Assurance must be marked as TTP-Assisted
(e.g., by use of TTPAdmin flag).
</i>
</li></ol>
<p class="q"> And all the rest in pink box be pushed into the HANDBOOK. This way, the policy sets requirements and standards, and AO is responsible for meeting them as a PRACTICE. </p>
<blockquote><table border="1" bgcolor="lightpink"><tr><td>
<p>
These steps are taken.
</p>
<h3> <a name="3.1"> 3.1 </a> Preliminaries </h3>
<ol> <li>
<p>
The Member creates her account
and attempts to be assured by the routine face-to-face process.
</p>
</li><li>
<p>
Once determining that none are conveniently located,
the Member contacts an Assurer who is enabled to
conduct TTP-assisted assurances in the region.
</p>
</li><li>
<p>
The Assurer confirms that the Member
agrees to the CAcert Community Agreement (CCA),
including the Dispute Resolution Policy (DRP).
</p>
</li><li>
The Assurer confirms that standard Assurances do not meet
the needs of the Member.
<span class="change">
This is only likely in areas not well-served with Assurers.
</span>
</p>
</li><li>
<p>
The Member and Assurer must negotiate the selection of TTPs
and the provision of adequate identification documents to the TTP.
Each TTP can only be used once (within one assurance for this Member).
</p>
<p class="q">iang: this may suggest a Patch required to the system that permits the Assurer to check other TTP Assurances of the member.</p>
</li><li>
Assurer agrees to conduct the TTP-assisted Assurance,
and gives the Member a Token.
</li></ol>
<h3> <a name="3.2"> 3.2 </a> Face-to-face meeting with the TTP </h3>
<ol><li>
<p>
The TTP and the Member meet face-to-face.
</p>
</li><li>
<p>
The TTP shall confirm that:
</p>
<ol type="a"><li>
The Member agrees to the CCA.
</li><li>
The Name and Date of Birth details recorded on the form
are matched by those in the identity documents.
</li><li>
The method (document type and issuer, not numbers)
by which the Name and DoB details are matched
is stated on the form.
</li><li>
Location of the meeting.
</li><li>
Contact details for the TTP
</li><li>
Assurer's Name and Token.
</li></ol>
</li><li>
<p>
The TTP shall use either the local form of document
(on CAcert's approved list), or a CAcert-provided form.
</p>
</li><li>
<p>
The TTP shall log the event by their customary means,
including the Assurer's Name and Verification Token.
</p>
<p class="q">Old: leaving a Remote Assurance Form and copies of identity documents with the TTP for at least 60 days</p>
</li><li>
<p>
The paperwork is sent to the Assurer by the TTP.
</p>
<span class="q">
<p>Old: sending a Remote Assurance Form and copies of identity documents to the Assurer by mutually agreed medium (eg post, web form or encrypted email).</p>
<p>iang: this clause <B>is similar</B> to the requirement DRC C.9.b:</p>
<blockquote><u>"RAs provide the CA with complete documentation on each verified applicant for a certificate."</u></blockquote>
<p>What is different is that the criteria requires the TTP to send the form, not the Member.</p>
</span>
</li></ol>
<h3> <a name="3.3"> 3.3 </a> Completion of the Assurance </h3>
<ol><li>
<p>
The Assurer must confirm the assurance using the paperwork,
</p><p>
The Assurer must
be satisfied as to the identity and competency of the TTP
in identification procedures,
as though they were to be conducting the assurance themselves
</p>
<span class="q">
<p>iang: this clause would probably meet DRC C.9.a:
<blockquote><u>"When the CA uses an external registration authority (RA), each RA is positively identified by CA personnel before being authorized to verify identities of subscribers and authorizations of individuals to represent organizational subscribers (see §A.2.v)."</u></blockquote>
For that reason, the above clause should be considered strongly,
and either discussed further in the Handbook, or include these
other Older suggestions:
<p>RA MUST authenticate the TTP to their satisfaction by:
</p>
<ol style="list-style-type: lower-roman;">
<li>searching for their details in an appropriate, official public registry (eg government site, association registry, telephone book) </li>
<li>contacting the TTP using these details to verify their identity </li>
<li>verifying that the TTP is suitable in terms of meeting the requirements of this policy </li>
<li>verifying that the meeting did indeed take place and that the Assuree was adequately identified </li>
</ol>
</span><br />
</i></blockquote>
</li><li>
The Assurer may contact the TTP, quoting Name and Verification Token.
</li><li>
On completion of the assurance, the Assurer
allocates standard full Assurance Points
(35 at time of writing)
to the Member.
Given the work involved, the Assurer should
strive to ensure that full points are allocated
by for example requesting any rework required.
<p class="q">iang: this clause might be better off in the Handbook. Dominik+1</p>
</li><li>
The assurance must be entered into the system
using the TTP flag/method.
</li><li>
The paperwork is held by the Assurer
according to the normal Assurance Policy rules
(at time of writing, for 7 years,
and available to Arbitrators only).
</li> </ol>
</td></tr></table></blockquote>
<h2> <a name="4"> 4. </a> Assurance Officer ("AO") </h2>
<p>
The Board routinely delegates its responsibilities to the
Assurance Officer (and this section assumes that, but does
not require it).
</p>
<p>
A report is requested annually from the Assurance Officer
on performance of this policy for the association's
annual report.
</p>
<h3 id="s4.1"> 4.1 Practice </h3>
<p>
Assurance Officer should prepare
<span class="change">
a detailed documentation under
<a href="//wiki.cacert.org/AssuranceHandbook">AH</a>
that meets the needs of this policy, including:
</span>
<span class="strike">
documentation
to support the TTP-assisted Assurance, including:
</span>
</p>
<ul><li>
Form for TTPs
</li><li>
Guide for TTPs.
</li><li>
Form for TTP-assisted assurance (used by Assurer)
</li><li>
Guide <span class="change"> and protocol </span>
<span class="q"> (pink box above)</span>
for Assurers.
</li><li>
Mechanisms for contacting Assurers available for
TTP-assisted Assurances.
</li><li class="change">
Definition of
<a href="https://wiki.cacert.org/AssuranceHandbook2#What_is_a_Senior_Assurer.3F">
Senior Assurer</a>.
</li></ul>
<h3 id="s4.2"> 4.2 Deserts </h3>
<p>
<span class="change">
The Assurance Officer maintains a list of regions
that are designated as '<i>deserts,</i>' being areas that are so short
of Assurers as to render face-to-face Assurance impractical.
In each region, approved types of TTP are listed (e.g., Notary).
The list is expected to vary according to the
different juridical traditions of different regions.
</span>
Changes to the regional lists are prepared by
either an Organisation Assurer for that region
(as described by OAP)
or by two Assurers familiar with the traditions
in that region.
Changes are then submitted to the Board for approval.
</p>
<p>
Use of a type of TTP not on the list must be approved by
<span class="change">
AO and notified to
</span>
Board.
<span class="change">
It is an explicit goal to reduce the usage of
TTP-assisted Assurances in favour of face-to-face Assurance.
</span>
<p>
<p>
In coordination with internal and external auditors,
the Assurance Officer shall design and implement a
suitable programme to meet the needs of audit.
Where approved by auditors or Board, the Assurance
Officer may document and implement minor variations to this policy.
</p>
<h2 class="change"> <a name="5"> 5. </a> Topup Assurance Points </h2>
<ul class="q"><li>uli: did we discuss the points gained thru a TTP assurance?</li>
<li>From the calculation with the 35 pts, a TTP assuree never can reach the 100 pts level ...
2x 35 = 70 pts max. So he probably can never become an Assurer. One goal with the
TTP program is, to bring people upto 100 pts, so they can start to be a
regular Assurer. This goal cannot be reached neither by the Nucleus program
in conjunction to the TTP program. Is this as expected ?</li>
<li>Alternate plan: issue 50 pts (temporarly) with 2 TTP assurances. As enough people
are in an area, they can start Assure each other. With enough points received,
the temporarly 50 pts can be decreased to the default 35 pts level
(see also the Nucleus program). But issuing temporarly 50 pts, needs probably
also a software update to the system.</li>
<li>Iang: see below for one idea we discussed.</li>
</ul>
<p class="change">
AO is to operate a topup Assurance programme
to help seed desert areas with Assurers.
</p>
<p class="change">
A topup Assurance is conducted by a third Senior Assurer
according to the following requirements:
</p>
<ol class="change"><li>
Assurer must be a Senior Assurer.
</li><li>
Assurer Challenge must be completed as passed by Member.
</li><li>
The topup must be requested by Member for purpose of enabling the Member to reach Assurer level.
</li><li>
The two TTP-Assisted Assurances already conducted are to be reviewed.
</li><li>
Topup may award up to 35 points.
</li><li>
Assurance must be marked as Topup
(e.g., by use of new feature with TTPAdmin flag).
</ol></li>
<p class="change">
Each topup is to be reported to AO.
Topup is only available in designated deserts.
</p>
</body>
</html>