From 01b0b9fc156cf58b8172271b7e0b93ee17194d4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: source <source@cacert.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:44:39 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed wrongly recorded policy decision Cleanup

git-svn-id: http://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies@1958 14b1bab8-4ef6-0310-b690-991c95c89dfd
---
 CertificationPracticeStatement.html | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CertificationPracticeStatement.html b/CertificationPracticeStatement.html
index 017976a..0e53120 100755
--- a/CertificationPracticeStatement.html
+++ b/CertificationPracticeStatement.html
@@ -614,8 +614,7 @@ according to documents.
 <p>
 <b>Advanced Certificates.</b>
 Members who are as yet unassured are not permitted to create
-advanced forms such as wildcard or subjectAltName
-certificates.
+advanced forms such as wildcard certificates.
 </p>
 
 
@@ -1116,7 +1115,6 @@ The Subscriber Naming consists of:
 </ul>
 
   <ul class="q">
-    <li> <a href="http://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=672"> bug 672</a> filed on subjectAltName.</li>
     <li> O-Admin must verify as per <a href="http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/PolicyDecisions">p20081016</a>. </li>
     <li> it is a wip for OAP to state how this is done. </li>
     <li> curiously, (RFC5280) verification is only mandated for subjectAltName not subject field. </li>