diff --git a/DisputeResolutionPolicy.html b/DisputeResolutionPolicy.html
index d2e4928..4f88a8d 100644
--- a/DisputeResolutionPolicy.html
+++ b/DisputeResolutionPolicy.html
@@ -66,6 +66,10 @@
+ - Uli: 20121215,
+ Modified presentation of outstanding 'board' changes: 3.5, 3.6, 4.2.
+ These three changes are now shown in green pending policy group debate.
+
- Bernd: 20121213,
Minor Changes posted on policy group for sections 2.2,3.2,3.4.
@@ -692,10 +696,11 @@ constitute an intentional or grossly negligent breach of duty.
The above provisions may only be overridden by
appeal process.
-
+
(by means of a new dispute causing
referral to the Board).
-
+
+
Removal to be discussed on policy group.
3.6 Remedies
@@ -751,8 +756,9 @@ He may rule and instruct any of the parties on these issues.
The Arbitrator is not limited within the general domain
of CAcert, and may instruct novel remedies as seen fit.
Novel remedies outside the domain may be routinely
-confirmed by the Board by way of appeal process,
+confirmed by the Board by way of appeal process,
in order to establish precedent.
+ Removal to be discussed on policy group.
4. Appendix
@@ -804,7 +810,9 @@ Some disadvantages exist.
-
Members may have their rights trampled over.
In such a case, the community should strive to
- re-open the case and refer it to the board.
+ re-open the case
+
and refer it to the board .
+ Removal to be discussed on policy group.
-
Members may feel overwhelmed by the formality
of the process.