cacert/cacert-policies
9
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

more minor changes from Bernd

Browse source 
git-svn-id: http://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies@2428 14b1bab8-4ef6-0310-b690-991c95c89dfd
This commit is contained in:
Ian Grigg 2012-12-13 14:52:08 +00:00
parent 3d2ccab84d
commit 22894c9bca
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
DisputeResolutionPolicy.html
View file

@ -66,6 +66,9 @@
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer"><img style="float: right; border-width: 0" src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml11" alt="Valid XHTML 1.1" height="31" width="88" /></a>
<ul>
<li>Bernd: 20121213,
Minor Changes posted on policy group for sections 2.2,3.2,3.4.
</li>
<li>Bernd: 20121211,
Changes posted on policy group for sections 0, 2.2-4.
</li>
@ -207,7 +210,7 @@ The Case Manager (CM) takes control of the filing.
<p>
The personnel within the CAcert support team
are Case Managers, by default, or as directed
by the Dispute Resolution Officer.
by the Dispute Resolution Officer <span class="change2">(DRO)</span>.
</p>
<h3 id="s1.4"> 1.4 Contents</h3>
@ -248,7 +251,8 @@ attaching the original messages.
<p>
The Case Manager selects the Arbitrator according
to the mechanism managed by the Dispute Resolution Officer
to the mechanism managed by the
<span class="change2">DRO</span> <!-- Dispute Resolution Officer -->
and approved from time to time.
This mechanism is to maintain a list of Arbitrators available for
dispute resolution.
@ -303,7 +307,7 @@ The Arbitrator conducts some preliminaries:
more appropriate.
However, this is strictly limited to those parties,
and especially, CAcert <span class="change">Inc.</span> and other parties
remains under the governing law.
remain under the governing law.
</li><li>
The Arbitrator reviews the Respondents and Claimants
with a view to dismissal or joining of additional parties.
@ -592,7 +596,7 @@ Arbitrator declare the Ruling private <i>under seal</i>.
Such a declaration must be reviewed in its entirety
by the Board,
and the Board must confirm or deny that declaration.
If it confirms, the existance of any Rulings under seal
If it confirms, the existence of any Rulings under seal
must be published to the
<span class="change2">
Members