p20110108 incorporated
git-svn-id: http://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies@2171 14b1bab8-4ef6-0310-b690-991c95c89dfd
This commit is contained in:
Ian Grigg
parent
2706f4bf88
commit
2aac8a5afc
1 changed files with 53 additions and 26 deletions
|
|
@ -30,6 +30,14 @@
|
|||
color : blue;
|
||||
text-decoration:line-through;
|
||||
}
|
||||
.draftadd {
|
||||
color : darkblue;
|
||||
font-weight: bold;
|
||||
}
|
||||
.draftdrop {
|
||||
color : lightblue;
|
||||
text-decoration:line-through;
|
||||
}
|
||||
-->
|
||||
</style>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -45,18 +53,28 @@
|
|||
</big>
|
||||
This document is a <b>work-in-progress</b> to include future revisions only,<br />
|
||||
and is currently <b>only relevant for the [policy] group</b>.<br />
|
||||
<span class="change">Additions in BLUE</span> <span class="strike">strikes in BLUE</span> are suggestions for future voting in PG.<br />
|
||||
<span class="change2">minor and routine tweaks are in steelblue</span>.<br />
|
||||
Colour code:<ul>
|
||||
<li> <span class="change">Additions in BLUE</span> <span class="strike">strikes in BLUE</span> are suggestions for future voting in PG.</li>
|
||||
<li> <span class="change2">minor and routine tweaks are in steelblue</span>.</li>
|
||||
<li> DRAFT-approved <span class="draftadd">additions in darkblue</span> and <span class="draftdrop">subtractions in lightblue</span> are already approved by a policy group motion.</li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer"><img style="float: right; border-width: 0" src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml11" alt="Valid XHTML 1.1" height="31" width="88" /></a>
|
||||
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
<li>Iang: 20110129 <a href="//wiki.cacert.org/PolicyDecisions#p20110108">p20110108</a> approved,
|
||||
<ul><li>incorporated new text as <span class="draftadd">darkblue</span> and dropped text as <span class="draftdrop">lightblue</span>,
|
||||
<li> use of colours to meet PoP 5.3,</li>
|
||||
<li> fixed some other references to Board as Appeal. Proposed to incorporate these without further discussion.</li>
|
||||
<li> Reviewed and changed the term CAcert to CAcert Inc. where clear. Proposed to incorporate these without further discussion.</li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
<li>Iang: 20110117 Changed 3.4 title to match the intent of the paras more closely, in <span class="change">BLUE</span>.</li>
|
||||
<li>Iang: 20110112 Tuned text in <a href="#3.3">3.3</a> to reflect ultimate final & binding status in 3.4. Also swapped order of terms to more customary form. Shown in <span class="change">BLUE</span>.</li>
|
||||
<li>Iang: 20110107 <b>Added proposed text in <a href="#3.4">3.4</a> to switch the Appeal from the Board to a Panel within Arbitration.</b> Shown in <span class="change">BLUE</span>. This change is substantive. </li>
|
||||
<li>Iang: Several changes to fix terms up:
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
<li><span class="change2">20101229</span>: Completed <span class="change2">steelblue</span> changes from <i>Users</i> to <i>Members</i>.</li>
|
||||
<li><span class="change2">20101215</span>: Added <span class="change2">steelblue</span>. Term <i>Registered User Agreement</i> changed to CCA, as explained above. </li>
|
||||
<li><span class="change2">20101215</span>: Added <span class="change2">steelblue</span>. Term <i>Registered User Agreement</i> changed to CCA, as explained below. </li>
|
||||
<li> The historical background: The change in terms (shown in <span class="change2">steelblue</span>) repair errors in production. The DRP ran ahead of other documents especially CCA in its approval process. Later on, in policy group, <a href="//wiki.cacert.org/PolicyDecisions#p20080106.1">we changed the term <i>User</i> to <i>Member</i></a>, at 11th hour in the approval process for CCA. </li>
|
||||
<li> <b> Therefore</b>, with addition of <a href="//wiki.cacert.org/PolicyDecisions#p20100306">p20100306</a>, this change is proposed by Policy Officer to be incorporated into next approved change without a vote on these changes in terms. If anyone wants to put it to the vote, go ahead! </li>
|
||||
</ul></li>
|
||||
|
|
@ -71,12 +89,14 @@
|
|||
<td>
|
||||
Name: DRP <a style="color: steelblue" href="//svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/ControlledDocumentList.html">COD7</a><br />
|
||||
Status: POLICY <a style="color: steelblue" href="//wiki.cacert.org/wiki/TopMinutes-20070917">m20070919.3</a><br />
|
||||
<span class="draftadd">DRAFT p20110108</span> <br />
|
||||
<span class="change">WIP since 20101215</span> <br />
|
||||
Editor: <a style="color: steelblue" href="//wiki.cacert.org/TeusHagen">Teus Hagen
|
||||
</a><br />
|
||||
Licence: <a style="color: steelblue" href="//wiki.cacert.org/Policy#Licence" title="this document is Copyright © CAcert Inc., licensed openly under CC-by-sa with all disputes resolved under DRP. More at wiki.cacert.org/Policy" > CC-by-sa+DRP </a><br /></td>
|
||||
<td valign="top" align="right">
|
||||
<a href="//www.cacert.org/policy/PolicyOnPolicy.php"><img src="images/cacert-policy.png" alt="TTP-Assist Status - DRAFT" height="31" width="88" style="border-style: none;" /></a>
|
||||
<a href="//www.cacert.org/policy/PolicyOnPolicy.php"><img src="images/cacert-policy.png" alt="TTP-Assist Status - POLICY" height="31" width="88" style="border-style: none;" /></a><br />
|
||||
<a href="//www.cacert.org/policy/PolicyOnPolicy.php"><img src="images/cacert-draft.png" alt="TTP-Assist Status - DRAFT" height="31" width="88" style="border-style: none;" /></a>
|
||||
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
|
|
@ -223,9 +243,9 @@ closed with status "declined."
|
|||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Arbitrators are experienced Assurers of CAcert.
|
||||
Arbitrators are experienced Assurers <span class="strike">of CAcert</span>.
|
||||
They should be independent and impartial, including
|
||||
of CAcert itself where it becomes a party.
|
||||
of CAcert <span class="change">Inc.</span> itself where it becomes a party.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="s2"> 2. The Arbitration</h2>
|
||||
|
|
@ -234,13 +254,13 @@ of CAcert itself where it becomes a party.
|
|||
<h3 id="s2.1"> 2.1 Authority</h3>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
The Board of CAcert and the
|
||||
The Board of CAcert <span class="change">Inc.</span> and the
|
||||
<span class="change2">
|
||||
Members of the Community
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
vest in Arbitrators
|
||||
full authority to hear disputes and deliver rulings
|
||||
which are binding on CAcert and the
|
||||
which are binding on CAcert <span class="change">Inc.</span> and the
|
||||
<span class="change2">
|
||||
Members.
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -264,7 +284,7 @@ The Arbitrator conducts some preliminaries:
|
|||
agree, are under such jurisdiction, and it is deemed
|
||||
more appropriate.
|
||||
However, this is strictly limited to those parties,
|
||||
and especially, CAcert and other parties
|
||||
and especially, CAcert <span class="change">Inc.</span> and other parties
|
||||
remains under the governing law.
|
||||
</li><li>
|
||||
The Arbitrator reviews the Respondents and Claimants
|
||||
|
|
@ -381,7 +401,10 @@ to be considered carefully:
|
|||
</span>
|
||||
that were formed without
|
||||
a clause to seek arbitration in the forum;
|
||||
<ul class="q"><li> Refer to issue of contracting out; more certainty might be required on this point. </li></ul>
|
||||
<ul class="q">
|
||||
<li> Refer to issue of contracting out; more certainty might be required on this point. </li>
|
||||
<li> s/clause/intent/ ? </li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
</li><li>
|
||||
Areas where laws fall outside the Arbitration Act,
|
||||
such as privacy;
|
||||
|
|
@ -412,7 +435,8 @@ That is, as
|
|||
<span class="change2">
|
||||
Members
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
of CAcert, you agree to resolve
|
||||
<span class="strike">of CAcert</span>,
|
||||
you agree to resolve
|
||||
all disputes before CAcert's forum.
|
||||
This is sometimes called <i>private law</i>
|
||||
or <i>alternative dispute resolution</i>.
|
||||
|
|
@ -450,11 +474,11 @@ seek to have a case heard or to override a Ruling.
|
|||
for jurisdiction or other reasons.
|
||||
By way of example, if all Parties are
|
||||
<span class="change2">
|
||||
Members of CAcert,
|
||||
Members,
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
then jurisdiction more normally falls within the forum.
|
||||
If the Arbitrator rules to reject,
|
||||
he should do so only after consulting with CAcert counsel.
|
||||
he should do so only after consulting with CAcert <span class="change">Inc.</span> counsel.
|
||||
The Arbitrator's jurisidiction is ordinarily that of
|
||||
dealing with the order, and
|
||||
not that which the external court has claimed to.
|
||||
|
|
@ -471,7 +495,7 @@ The Arbitrator follows the procedure:
|
|||
<ol><li>
|
||||
Establish the facts.
|
||||
The Arbitrator collects the evidence from the parties.
|
||||
The Arbitrator may order CAcert or
|
||||
The Arbitrator may order CAcert <span class="change">Inc.</span> or
|
||||
<span class="change2">
|
||||
Members
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -553,9 +577,9 @@ in a timely manner
|
|||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
The Ruling is
|
||||
<span class="change">ordinarily final and binding</span>
|
||||
<span class="strike">binding and final</span>
|
||||
on CAcert and all
|
||||
<span class="draftadd">ordinarily final and binding</span>
|
||||
<span class="draftdrop">binding and final</span>
|
||||
on CAcert <span class="change">Inc.</span> and all
|
||||
<span class="change2">
|
||||
Members
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -584,15 +608,15 @@ but the Ruling must be presented in filing any dispute
|
|||
in another forum such as the person's local courts.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3 id="s3.4"> 3.4 <span class="change">Review for Appeal</span> <span class="strike">Re-opening the Case or Appeal</span> </h3>
|
||||
<h3 id="s3.4"> 3.4 <span class="draftadd">Review for Appeal</span> <span class="draftdrop">Re-opening the Case or Appeal</span> </h3>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
In the <span class="change">event</span> <span class="strike">case</span> of clear injustices, egregious behaviour or
|
||||
In the <span class="draftadd">event</span> <span class="draftdrop">case</span> of clear injustices, egregious behaviour or
|
||||
unconscionable Rulings,
|
||||
<span class="change">
|
||||
<span class="draftadd">
|
||||
a review may be requested by filing a dispute.
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
<span class="strike">
|
||||
<span class="draftdrop">
|
||||
parties may seek to re-open the
|
||||
case by filing a dispute.
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -602,7 +626,7 @@ whether the case may be re-opened or not.
|
|||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
<span class="change">
|
||||
<span class="draftadd">
|
||||
If the Review Arbitrator rules the case be re-opened,
|
||||
then the Review Arbitrator refers the case to an Appeal Panel of 3.
|
||||
The Appeal Panel is led by a Senior Arbitrator,
|
||||
|
|
@ -610,7 +634,7 @@ and is formed according to procedures established
|
|||
by the DRO from time to time.
|
||||
The Appeal Panel hears the case and delivers a final and binding Ruling.
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
<span class="strike">
|
||||
<span class="draftdrop">
|
||||
If the new Arbitrator rules the case be re-opened,
|
||||
then it is referred to the Board of CAcert Inc.
|
||||
The Board hears the case and delivers a final
|
||||
|
|
@ -634,8 +658,11 @@ constitute an intentional or grossly negligent breach of duty.
|
|||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
The above provisions may only be overridden by
|
||||
appeal process (by means of a new dispute causing
|
||||
appeal process.
|
||||
<span class="draftdrop">
|
||||
(by means of a new dispute causing
|
||||
referral to the Board).
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3 id="s3.6"> 3.6 Remedies </h3>
|
||||
|
|
@ -690,7 +717,7 @@ He may rule and instruct any of the parties on these issues.
|
|||
The Arbitrator is not limited within the general domain
|
||||
of CAcert, and may instruct novel remedies as seen fit.
|
||||
Novel remedies outside the domain may be routinely
|
||||
confirmed by the Board by way of appeals process,
|
||||
confirmed <span class="draftdrop"> by the Board</span> by way of appeal process,
|
||||
in order to establish precedent.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -743,7 +770,7 @@ Some disadvantages exist.
|
|||
<ul><li>
|
||||
<span class="change2">Members</span> may have their rights trampled over.
|
||||
In such a case, the community should strive to
|
||||
re-open the case and refer it to the board.
|
||||
re-open the case <span class="draftdrop">and refer it to the board<span>.
|
||||
</li><li>
|
||||
<span class="change2">Members</span> may feel overwhelmed by the formality
|
||||
of the process.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue