cacert
/
cacert-policies
8
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 3 Pull Requests 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

text before and after <hr>'s removed

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: http://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies@2440 14b1bab8-4ef6-0310-b690-991c95c89dfd
pull/1/head
Ulrich Schroeter 12 years ago
parent cffaf9a259
commit 469ec079af
1 changed files with 0 additions and 52 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File

52
DisputeResolutionPolicy_p20121213.html
Unescape Escape View File

@ -46,15 +46,6 @@
</head>
<body>
<p style="text-align: center;">
Colour code:<ul>
<li> <span class="change2">minor and routine tweaks are in steelblue</span>.</li>
<li> DRAFT-approved <span class="draftadd">additions</span> and <span class="draftdrop">subtractions</span> are <span class="draftadd">shown in darkblue</span> as approved by a policy group motion.</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">A history of modifications is maintained at the end.</p>
<hr />
<div class="comment">
@ -798,49 +789,6 @@ Note also that many elements of legal proceedings are
deliberately left out of the rules.
</p>
<hr />
<p style="text-align: center;">History of modifications:</p>
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer"><img style="float: right; border-width: 0" src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml11" alt="Valid XHTML 1.1" height="31" width="88" /></a>
<ul>
<li>Bernd: 20121221,
p20121213 motion carried. Changes approved under the motion
are shown in <span class="draftadd">darkblue</span>.
</li>
<li>Uli: 20121215,
Modified presentation of outstanding 'board' changes: 3.5, 3.6, 4.2.
These three changes are now shown in <span class="q">green</span> pending policy group debate.
</li>
<li>Bernd: 20121213,
Minor Changes posted on policy group for sections 2.2,3.2,3.4.
</li>
<li>Bernd: 20121211,
Changes posted on policy group for sections 0, 2.2-4.
</li>
<li>Iang: 20121112,
Reviewed changes CAcert to CAcert Inc and to Community.
These are shown in <span class="change">BLUE</span>.
Added a few more.
</li>
<li>Iang: 20110129 <a href="//wiki.cacert.org/PolicyDecisions#p20110108">p20110108</a> approved,
<ul><li>incorporated new text as <span class="draftadd">darkblue</span> and dropped text as <span class="draftdrop">purple</span>,
<li> use of colours to meet PoP 5.3,</li>
<li> fixed some other references to Board as Appeal. Proposed to incorporate these without further discussion.</li>
<li> Reviewed and changed the term CAcert to CAcert Inc. where clear. Proposed to incorporate these without further discussion.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Iang: 20110117 Changed 3.4 title to match the intent of the paras more closely, in <span class="change">BLUE</span>.</li>
<li>Iang: 20110112 Tuned text in <a href="#3.3">3.3</a> to reflect ultimate final &amp; binding status in 3.4. Also swapped order of terms to more customary form. Shown in <span class="change">BLUE</span>.</li>
<li>Iang: 20110107 <b>Added proposed text in <a href="#3.4">3.4</a> to switch the Appeal from the Board to a Panel within Arbitration.</b> Shown in <span class="change">BLUE</span>. This change is substantive. </li>
<li>Iang: Several changes to fix terms up:
<ul>
<li><span class="change2">20101229</span>: Completed <span class="change2">steelblue</span> changes from <i>Users</i> to <i>Members</i>.</li>
<li><span class="change2">20101215</span>: Added <span class="change2">steelblue</span>. Term <i>Registered User Agreement</i> changed to CCA, as explained below. </li>
<li> The historical background: The change in terms (shown in <span class="change2">steelblue</span>) repair errors in production. The DRP ran ahead of other documents especially CCA in its approval process. Later on, in policy group, <a href="//wiki.cacert.org/PolicyDecisions#p20080106.1">we changed the term <i>User</i> to <i>Member</i></a>, at 11th hour in the approval process for CCA. </li>
<li> <b> Therefore</b>, with addition of <a href="//wiki.cacert.org/PolicyDecisions#p20100306">p20100306</a>, this change is proposed by Policy Officer to be incorporated into next approved change without a vote on these changes in terms. If anyone wants to put it to the vote, go ahead! </li>
</ul></li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save