|
|
|
@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
|
|
|
|
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
|
|
|
|
|
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
|
|
|
|
|
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
|
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
|
|
|
<meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
|
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
|
|
|
<meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
|
|
|
|
|
<title>Configuration-Control Specification - work-in-progress</title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<style type="text/css"> <!-- only for WIP -->
|
|
|
|
@ -54,12 +54,12 @@ a:hover {
|
|
|
|
|
Editor: Iang<br />
|
|
|
|
|
Status: 20100420 <i>WIP</i> <br />
|
|
|
|
|
</td><td align="right">
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="//www.cacert.org/policy/PolicyOnPolicy.html"><img src="Images/cacert-draft.png" alt="CCS Status - work-in-progress" height="31" width="88" style="border-style: none;" /></a>
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="//www.cacert.org/policy/PolicyOnPolicy.html"><img src="Images/cacert-wip.png" alt="CCS Status - work-in-progress" height="31" width="88" style="border-style: none;" /></a>
|
|
|
|
|
</td>
|
|
|
|
|
</tr>
|
|
|
|
|
</table>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3> <a name="s1">1</a> <a name="Introduction"> Introduction </a> </h3>
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="s1"> 1. Introduction </h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- This section from A.1.a through A.1.c -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -180,11 +180,11 @@ Critical software is defined by Security Policy.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<ul class="q">
|
|
|
|
|
<li>One thing that is not so well covered by CAcert is the last bullet point of A.1.i
|
|
|
|
|
<li>"communicating with subscribers and with the general public."
|
|
|
|
|
<li>website is under SP; maillists,blogs,etc are not.
|
|
|
|
|
<li>as community has deliberately gone this direction, I suggest we argue it that way.
|
|
|
|
|
<li> What is far more problematic is the failure to do CCA & Challenge notification.
|
|
|
|
|
<li>One thing that is not so well covered by CAcert is the last bullet point of A.1.i</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>"communicating with subscribers and with the general public."</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>website is under SP; maillists,blogs,etc are not.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>as community has deliberately gone this direction, I suggest we argue it that way.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li> What is far more problematic is the failure to do CCA & Challenge notification.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h4> <a name="s4.2">4.2</a> <a name="soft_change"> Change </a> </h4>
|
|
|
|
|