<ahref="http://www.cacert.org/policy/PolicyOnPolicy.php"><imgalign="right"src="Images/cacert-wip.png" alt="CAcert Policy On Governance Status == WIP"border="0"></a><p>
<ahref="http://www.cacert.org/policy/PolicyOnPolicy.php"><imgalign="right"src="images/cacert-wip.png" alt="CAcert Policy On Governance Status == WIP"border="0"></a><p>
Creation date: 20100405<br>
Status: <b>WIP</b><br>
Author: p.dunkel at cacert dot org<br/>
@ -52,4 +52,4 @@
<p>The executive branch nominates members of the judicative branch. The judicative branch in turn arbitrates disputes not only between members of CAcert, but also between the branches of CAcert governance. The legislative lays down the polices that all branches of CAcert governance, as well as all CAcert members, use do direct their actions.</p>
The counter-situation to a weak CCA agreement is that if a person (of any age) feels the CCA to be inappropriate, then they have not entered into the Community. The Arbitrator is at liberty to terminate the CCA with a Member, if there is a sustainable view that it is inappropriate. Such termination should include measures needed to repair the web of trust.