From e9fe661bca93780dd1a970246b2fe57d4ad1e55f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ulrich Schroeter Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:18:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 3.5, 3.6, 4.2 topics that remains from POLICY document, edited under p20121113 and reverted back to previous state, that aren't under vote in p20121213 but needs further discussions in policy group So it doesn't contradicts to header definiton: " DRAFT-approved additions in darkblue and subtractions in purple are already approved by a policy group motion." git-svn-id: http://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies@2430 14b1bab8-4ef6-0310-b690-991c95c89dfd --- DisputeResolutionPolicy.html | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/DisputeResolutionPolicy.html b/DisputeResolutionPolicy.html index 4f88a8d..315eb85 100644 --- a/DisputeResolutionPolicy.html +++ b/DisputeResolutionPolicy.html @@ -695,12 +695,14 @@ constitute an intentional or grossly negligent breach of duty.

The above provisions may only be overridden by -appeal process. - -(by means of a new dispute causing -referral to the Board). - -

Removal to be discussed on policy group.
+appeal process + (by means of a new dispute causing referral to the Board). + + +

3.6 Remedies

@@ -756,9 +758,14 @@ He may rule and instruct any of the parties on these issues. The Arbitrator is not limited within the general domain of CAcert, and may instruct novel remedies as seen fit. Novel remedies outside the domain may be routinely -confirmed by the Board by way of appeal process, +confirmed by the Board by way of appeal process, in order to establish precedent. -
Removal to be discussed on policy group.
+ + +

4. Appendix

@@ -811,8 +818,15 @@ Some disadvantages exist. Members may have their rights trampled over. In such a case, the community should strive to re-open the case - and refer it to the board . -
Removal to be discussed on policy group.
+ and refer it to the board. + + + + +
  • Members may feel overwhelmed by the formality of the process.