-1. TO BE FIXED

w o r k -- i n -- p r o g r e s s
CAcert 3rd Party - Disclaimer and Licence - Status == wip

This is wip-V0.05 as of 20091213.


0. Preamble

This section is not part of the licence but may be explanatory. Skip to licence.

Being that,

And that,

And that, in offering the USE of certificates to the end-user,

And that,

We both, CA and Vendor, agree that,

With the above understanding, the following Licence and Disclaimer is offered by CAcert to Vendor.

3rd Party Vendor - Licence and Disclaimer

1. Agreement and Licence

1.1 Agreement

We (the Vendor and the CA) both agree to the terms and conditions in this agreement. The relationship between the CA and the Vendor is based on this agreement. Your agreement is given by your distribution of the root within your distribution of your root list.

1.2 Other Agreements

The relationship between the Vendor and the end-user is based on Vendor's own agreement ("end-user licence agreement" or EULA). Generally, the Vendor offers the EULA to the end-user in the act of distributing the software and roots.

The relationship between the CA and the end-user is based on CA's Non-Related Persons -- Disclaimer and Licence ("NRP-DaL"). This Licence follows the style of popular open source licences, in that it is offered to an unknown audience, without a necessary expectation for explicit agreement by the end-user, because of the methods and restrictions of delivery.

1.3 Licence to Distribute

CA offers this licence to permit Vendor to distribute CA's roots within Vendor's root list to Vendor's end-users.

1.4 Vendor's Agreement with End-User

Vendor agrees

  1. to distribute both the NRP-DaL and this present agreement to end-user,
  2. to advise the end-user of the NRP-DaL appropriately.

1.5 Fair and Non-Discriminatory

Vendor agrees to make available CA's root key in a fair and non-discriminatory way to Vendor's end-users.

In accordance with the general principles of PKI and the fact that the CA makes statements of interest within certificates, the Vendor is strongly encouraged to reasonably represent to the end-user that the CA is the issuer of the certificate and the maker of claims within the certificate. The extent to which the end-user is aware that the CA is the person making claims is likely to be material in a dispute over claims.

2. Disclaimer

2.1 All Liability

Vendor's relationship with end-users creates risks, liabilities and obligations due to the end-user's permitted USE of the certificates, and potentially through other activities such as inappropriate and non-permitted RELIANCE.

We in general DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY to each other. Vendor acknowledges and confirms that the CA disclaims all liability to the end-user in NRP-DaL.

2.2 Monetary Limits on Liability

Notwithstanding the general disclaimer on liability above, we agree that, liability of Vendor and of the CA is strictly limited to be 1000 euros. This is the same limit of liability that applies to each member of the CAcert Community.

3. Legal Matters

3.1 Law

The Choice of Law is that of NSW, Australia. Policies in force within CAcert are incorporated.

3.2 Dispute Resolution

We agree that all disputes arising out of or in connection to this agreement and the root and certificates of the CA shall be referred to and finally resolved by Arbitration under the Dispute Resolution Policy of the CA (COD7). The ruling of the Arbitrator is binding and final on CA and Vendor alike.

The following parts are not part of the above licence, but may shed light.

Z. FAQ

Z.1 Notes on Liability

Liability agreement between CA and Vendor suggests that the end-user be presented with the name of the CA. This is useful for identifying the particular characteristics of the CA, and accepts that all CAs are different. Each CA has its ways of checking, its relevent laws, and its particular view as to the interests of the end-user.

The Vendor should present the name of the CA so as to inform the end-user of what can be known. In the event that the Vendor does not present the CA, the CA is taking on all the risk and liability that the CA is equivalent to others, which can only be rationally measured as the lowest-common-denominator, that is, the lowest of the liabilities that is accepted across all CAs that are shipped by the CA. This would generally be zero.

If the CA has been presented to the end-user, the end-user is able to discriminate. In this case, it is reasonable for the CA to offer to share the liability, and to accept some limit to that liability.

Always remembering that this is strictly within the relationship with the Vendor. As there are millions and one day, billions of users, and as the software and the certificates are free, the liability to the end-user must be disclaimed totally. In other words, set to zero.

Z.2 Reasonably Shown

To reasonably show the name of the CA is undefined, as security user interfaces currently are not representative of reasonable descriptions, and the area is an open research topic (sometimes known as "usable security").

A reasonable man test is known in law, and selects someone who would be the reasonable person who would use the software. This might hypothetically examine whether a majority of random users would have "got it" when presented with the same information, however this is not quite how it is tested in law; instead, it is more of a gut-feeling.

Z.3 Recursive Distribution

This licence is not intended to limit the ability of a re-distributor of Vendor's root list from operating under the same conditions as the Vendor. The licence applies equally to all distributors of CA's roots. It is the re-distributor's responsibility to be aware of this licence and to take appropriate steps. The primary Vendor discharges any responsibility to the re-distributor by making available this licence on the same basis as its other licences.