<li>Iang <spanclass="change">20101002</span>: Added the policy block and heading. That which is in the document is below the line. </li>
<li>Iang <spanclass="change">20101002</span>: Re-org of section 4.2 to better reflect current times. </li>
<li>Iang <spanclass="change">20101002</span>: added links to references policies. Note that the final link will <u><b>CHANGE</b></u> for WWW.cacert.org </li>
<li>Morten <spanclass="change">20100930</span>: RDL should distro certs not roots. Change is underlined as already in a change. </li>
<li>Iang <spanclass="change">20100929</span>: cleanup, minor fixes and some questions posed. </li>
<li>Iang <spanclass="change">20100830</span>: made clearer inclusion of certificate chain </li>
<li>Iang <spanclass="change">20100716</span>: fixed up to deal with RDL and dropping of NRP-DaL. Plus minor format changes, and to XHTML</li>
@ -53,7 +60,29 @@
</ul>
<hr/>
<divclass="comment">
<tablewidth="100%">
<tr>
<tdrowspan="2">
Name: CCA <astyle="color: steelblue"href="https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/ControlledDocumentList.html">COD9</a><br/>
-------- with WIP <astyle="color: steelblue"href="https://wiki.cacert.org/PolicyDecisions#p201010xx">p201010xx</a> in BLUE <br/>
Editor: Iang<br/>
</td>
<tdvalign="top"align="right">
<ahref="//www.cacert.org/policy/PolicyOnPolicy.php"><imgsrc="images/cacert-policy.png"alt="CCA Status - POLICY"height="31"width="88"style="border-style: none;"/></a>
<!-- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX delete this going to DRAFT -->
<br/>
<ahref="//www.cacert.org/policy/PolicyOnPolicy.php"><imgsrc="images/cacert-wip.png"alt="CCA Status - WIP"height="31"width="88"style="border-style: none;"/></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<h2> CAcert Community Agreement </h2>
<h3id="s0"> 0. Introduction </h3>
@ -112,7 +141,7 @@ being an operator of services to the Community.
Community. <br/>
</span>
<spanclass="change">
"Root Distribution Licence" ("RDL"), an agreement for licensing the distribution of roots.
"<ahref="//www.cacert.org/policy/RootDistributionLicence.php">Root Distribution Licence</a>" ("RDL"), an agreement for licensing the distribution of root<uclass="change">certificates</u>.
RDL replaces an earlier withdrawn licence (NRP-DaL).
</span>
</li><li>
@ -120,7 +149,7 @@ being an operator of services to the Community.
@ -158,14 +187,14 @@ being an operator of services to the Community.
used for signing certificates for Members.
In this document, the term includes any subroots.
</li><li>
"CAcert Official Document" ("COD" <spanclass="strike"> => COD3 </span>)
"<ahref="//svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/ControlledDocumentList.html">CAcert Official Document</a>" ("COD" <spanclass="strike"> => COD3 </span>)
<spanclass="strike">in</span><spanclass="change">is</span> a standard format for describing the details of
operation and governance essential to a certificate authority.
Changes are managed and controlled.
CODs define more technical terms.
See 4.2 for listing of relevant CODs.
</li><li>
"Certification Practice Statement" ("CPS" => COD6)
"<ahref="//www.cacert.org/policy/CertificationPracticeStatement.php">Certification Practice Statement</a>" ("CPS" => COD6)
is the document that controls details
about operational matters within CAcert.
</li><liclass="change">
@ -441,7 +470,7 @@ However, some information will continue to
be held for certificate processing purposes.
</p>
<ulclass="q"><li> Consider a change to the termination clause to make Support's job more easy?</li></ul>
<ulclass="q"><li> Consider a change to the termination clause to make Arbitration + Support's job more easy?</li></ul>
<p>
The provisions on Arbitration survive any termination
@ -512,37 +541,57 @@ policy process as this agreement, and they should
mirror and reinforce these terms.
</p>
<ulclass="q"><li> This clause was found to be badly written in the recent debate on CAcert Inc contracts. Clarify?</li></ul>
<ulclass="q">
<li> This clause was found to generate confusion in the recent debate on CAcert Inc contracts.</li>
<li> The intention was to create a space for a future 3rd-party-vendor's licence to distribute the roots, and to ensure a sense of equality with Members.</li>
<li> It was not intended to cover all contracts formed by (for example) the Board.</li>
<li> Since then, the RDL has been approved to DRAFT, and this clause may need re-writing.</li>
<li> Clarify?</li>
</ul>
<h4id="s4.2"> 4.2 References and Other Binding Documents </h4>
<p>
<pclass="strike">
This agreement is CAcert Official Document 9 (COD9)
and is a controlled document.
<spanclass="q">moved down.</span>
</p>
<p>
You are also bound by
<spanclass="change">the Policies of the Community,
of which the principle ones effecting Members are:</span>