cacert/cacert-policies
9
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

3.5, 3.6, 4.2 topics that remains from POLICY document, edited under p20121113 and reverted back to previous state, that aren't under vote in p20121213 but needs further discussions in policy group

Browse source 
So it doesn't contradicts to header definiton:
" DRAFT-approved additions in darkblue and subtractions in purple are already approved by a policy group motion."

git-svn-id: http://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies@2430 14b1bab8-4ef6-0310-b690-991c95c89dfd
This commit is contained in:
Ulrich Schroeter 2012-12-14 16:18:26 +00:00
parent 1438285552
commit e9fe661bca
1 changed files with 24 additions and 10 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

34
DisputeResolutionPolicy.html
View file

@ -695,12 +695,14 @@ constitute an intentional or grossly negligent breach of duty.
<p> <p>
The above provisions may only be overridden by The above provisions may only be overridden by
appeal process. appeal process
<span class="q"><s> (by means of a new dispute causing referral to the Board).
(by means of a new dispute causing
referral to the Board). <ul class="q">
</s></span> <li> (by means of a new dispute causing referral to the Board) </li>
<center><span class="q"><i>Removal to be discussed on policy group.</i></span></center> <li> Removal/Replacement to be further discussed on policy group. </li>
</ul>
</p> </p>
<h3 id="s3.6"> 3.6 Remedies </h3> <h3 id="s3.6"> 3.6 Remedies </h3>
@ -756,9 +758,14 @@ He may rule and instruct any of the parties on these issues.
The Arbitrator is not limited within the general domain The Arbitrator is not limited within the general domain
of CAcert, and may instruct novel remedies as seen fit. of CAcert, and may instruct novel remedies as seen fit.
Novel remedies outside the domain may be routinely Novel remedies outside the domain may be routinely
confirmed <span class="q"><s> by the Board </s></span> by way of appeal process, confirmed by the Board by way of appeal process,
in order to establish precedent. in order to establish precedent.
<center><span class="q"><i>Removal to be discussed on policy group.</i></span></center>
<ul class="q">
<li> by the Board </li>
<li> Removal/Replacement to be further discussed on policy group. </li>
</ul>
</p> </p>
<h2 id="s4"> 4. Appendix</h2> <h2 id="s4"> 4. Appendix</h2>
@ -811,8 +818,15 @@ Some disadvantages exist.
<span class="change2">Members</span> may have their rights trampled over. <span class="change2">Members</span> may have their rights trampled over.
In such a case, the community should strive to In such a case, the community should strive to
re-open the case re-open the case
<span class="q"><s> and refer it to the board </s></span>. and refer it to the board.
<center><span class="q"><i>Removal to be discussed on policy group.</i></span></center>
<ul class="q">
<li> and refer it to the board </li>
<li> Removal/Replacement to be further discussed on policy group. </li>
</ul>
</li><li> </li><li>
<span class="change2">Members</span> may feel overwhelmed by the formality <span class="change2">Members</span> may feel overwhelmed by the formality
of the process. of the process.